Saturday, 9 August 2008

Opening Ceremony

Crashed Rick's headquarters last night for the Opening Ceremonies of the 2008 Bejing Olympic Games. I brought a couple of packs of Grainwaves (the best), and plenty of Coke to keep us awake.

We were watching the proceedings on Rick's Commodore Amiga monitor which did the job.

The displays put on by the Olympic hosts were bizzare to say the least, yet still astounding in their execution. You find yourself staring at the screen wondering what 4 colourfully attired puppets have to do with the huge square pattern of a thousand or so dancers. The dancers with paint-brushes attached to their hands were incredibly agile and managed to draw a fairly decent picture on the huge scroll which appeared to be center stage for most of the preliminary events of the ceremony.

TV One Olympics commentator Keith Quinn entertained us with a number of amusing reflections on the ceremony. Refering to a parade of traditionally-dressed Chinese marchers he commented "They are representing the provinces which they represent". And a bit later on, "The silk-road was instrumental in allowing China to trade with... other countries". Give the guy a break though, I suppose he's not really into this stuff, his specialty is sport, and he had a few interesting statistics and comments to make about the teams as they came out into the Birds Nest Stadium.

We were treated to some pretty fantastic fireworks, and many other displays of China's power. I can only wonder at how they pulled off some of the spectacles. The girls flying about over the stage, suspended by wires. The guys running around the large globe which rose out of the floor of the stage, with Sarah Brightman and Liu Huan singing "You and Me", standing on top. Actually the synchronised boxes which rose up and down was pretty impressive too. As I commented to Rick, "The Chinese seem to like a lot of people doing the same thing at the same time." The Chinese National Anthem definitely had that Communist ring to it, and brought to mind the National Anthem of the USSR (a favourite - even if it's translation into English does send a shiver up your spine).

204 Countries! We turned the box off at about number 90, and had half an hour of sleep. 2:30am we woke up again and blimey, if they weren't still churning them out. We watched for a bit longer and then fell asleep again. We are die-hard Olympics fans... New Zealand apparently walked out onto the track immediately before China's team - which was last up, as is the tradition at the Olympic Games. I will steer clear of the political/ethical aspect of the Bejing Olympic Games for now, apart from quoting a Chinese person who said to me the other day "I will kill you if you disagree with the Bejing Olympics". Anyway, hope to blog on this interesting subject shortly. Till then,
Go New Zealand!

Weekly Joke

Hmmm, I don't think we have to have a joke every week, so today I'm going to publish a short biography of John Clarke (aka. Fred Dagg, Kiwi Comedian for those who don't know him). Click here to view John's website.

CLARKE, John, Dip Lid, PhD in Cattle (Oxen), Advisor and comforter to various governments. Born 1948. Educ. subsequently. Traveled extensively throughout Holy Lands, then left New Zealand for Europe. Stationed in London 1971-73. Escaped (decorated). Rejoined unit. Arrived Australia 1977. Held positions with ABC radio (sckd), ABC Television (Dfnct), Various newspapers (Dcd), and Aust Film Industry (Fkd). Currently a freelance expert specialising in matters of a general character. Recreations: Whistling. Address: C/- the people next door. Or just pop it inside the door of the fusebox. Should be back Friday.

Click here for "The Gumboot Song" by Fred Dagg

Friday, 8 August 2008

Suicide?

Huh.  Just noticed that someone found my blog by searching for "how to kill yourself" on NZ Google.  That's a bit disconcerting to say the least.  While I'm on the topic, another search query which brought something of a smile to my face, "love jimmy cowan" also directed a couple of people to my blog.

Prostaglandin Abortion

I don't believe it, this is too terrible for words.  In the video below, Father Frank Pavone explains the procedure of a prostaglandin abortion, and then Dr. Byron Calhoun goes into further detail.  This video is not suitable for children.



Please, don't just sit there and say "oh no".  Click here to get yourself a pro-life t-shirt (New Zealand or International), and find out how you can get active in raising awareness of this silent holocaust of our time.

And don't forget the words of Edmund Burke, "All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing."

Thursday, 7 August 2008

Use a Real Gun Next Time

On Monday 4 August, two apparently drugged up young (Polynesian) men wearing blue bandanas over their faces ran into the dairy on the corner of Orrick Crescent and Wainoni Road in Christchurch.  One was wielding a long knife, and the store-owner Nike said that the offenders were frantic, and life-threatening.  Below is the order of events

A dairy owner who wishes only to be known as Nike said he armed himself after Indian liquor store owner Navtej Singh was murdered by robbers in South Auckland in June.  Two robbers who he described as Polynesian, aged in their early 20s or late teens charged into his store on Wainoni Road about 8.30pm on Monday.  They were wearing blue bandanas over their faces, and one carried a long knife. Nike was cleaning out his cash register when a man ran at him and slashed at the air near his throat and chest, then backed him up against a cigarette rack. Nike's wife handed him the air pistol. Nike fired the air pistol at the robbers five or six times, hitting one of them. "I definitely shot one of them in the face. "Usually in the movies they say 'give me the money' but they tried to kill us from the very start. It happened really fast. They ran in holding the knife out and started trying to chop me."

Nike said he suspected the men were on drugs as "normal people don't act like that". "We would never have used (the gun) if they weren't so threatening. "They were frantic."

Detective Constable Grant, of the New Brighton police, said Nike's actions were "certainly not good practice". Grant said they were "discussing" whether Nike's actions would have further repercussions.

Asian Anti-crime Group campaigner Peter Low said the robbers were lucky it was only an air pistol and if they came into his store he would shoot them with a real gun. "The scum gangs have got to learn and the police need to wake up. They have invaded our rights. We have to defend ourselves. It's logic, it's common sense."

Compiled from the article on www.stuff.co.nz.

As is so often the case the emphasis is put on the victims of the assault, and we hear that the Police will be investigating (clears throat loudly) excuse me, who?  Yes, believe it or not, they are going to launch an investigation into the actions of the brave dairy owner, who defended the lives of himself and his wife.

When it is illegal for good law-abiding citizens to defend themselves, it means that the criminals often get their way.  Think back on the Virginia-Tech Massacre for a minute.  It was illegal for anyone on campus to be armed, and so when the murderer ran about the place with a gun, killing 33 people, there was no one able to stop him.

Bob McCoskrie of Family First responded to the incident,

"The safety of families should be paramount. If families are resorting to vigilante type actions, it begs the question – why aren’t we doing more to protect them?"


Use a real gun next time mate.


Hat-tip, NZ Conservative

Related Reading: 25 years murder-free in 'Gun Town USA', Folly of "Gun-Free Zones"

Full Restitution Bill Proposed

Our Free Land is a recently formed lobby group, whose vision is to, "empower the people of New Zealand so that Parliament becomes the servant and not the master of the free population of our country." I like that goal and so far, from what I've seen of their policies, they are definitely on the right track. You can visit their website here, www.ourfreeland.co.nz. Here is some information on their proposed Full Restitution Bill, which would be a huge improvement to New Zealand's justice system.

Bill #5: Small time criminals involved in welfare fraud or identity theft or those who have gained money or goods by dishonest means must make full restitution within 3 months of conviction.

Criminals who steal and use other peoples credit cards, cheque books or personal belongings must make full restitution within 3 months once convicted or they are sent to work full time together with those convicted of crimes worthy of a prison sentence.

After they have paid off their debt they may return to their former employment or continue working as do those who get the dole (see below).

For far too long small time crooks, after conviction, still been able to get away with refusing to pay their court-ordered fines or the restitution owing to individuals. We have large numbers of people who after years of waiting have still not been paid the money owed to them.

With this Bill Proposal we are not addressing large scale payments still owing. Rather, it is the small amounts that could be worked off in a matter of weeks or months that we want to deal with here.

When small-time criminals feel that the Justice System of our country has no teeth, they correctly get the impression that they can continue to get away with this kind of activity with impunity.

That all stops with the introduction of this Bill. No longer will the Justice System of NZ be the farce it is seen to be by many (both the criminal element and those who were their victims).

To make sure payment occurs, all restitution must go through a central tracking system before being sent out to those to whom it belongs. This way the onus is no longer on the victim to have to extract the money from the criminal - it has passed to the Courts and Police to make it happen.

For too long victims of this type of crime have not received the justice due to them. It is time to make amends and put it right.

It is a step in the right direction, but it doesn't go far enough. The particular brand of criminals being dealt with here should be made to pay back three times the amount that they have damaged/stolen. Also, prisons should not be run at the expense of the tax-payer. We should privatise prisons, with the possibility of some even turning into profitable ventures. Prisoners should no longer fill their days with idleness and boredom, but should instead be instilled with a sense of duty and purpose by making them pay their way throughout their imprisonment.  Full restitution should be seen as just as important as rehabilitation.

46,000,000

Yawn, it's almost 2am and I have a 9am lecture... I've been working on some JavaScript and have come up with the blog sidebar Abortion Countdown for all you cool pro-life girls and boys out there :)

Wednesday, 6 August 2008

No one Left to Speak for Me


Martin Niemoller was a German Christian, who first made this quote in 1946.  There are many different versions of the poem, and you can find out more about these on this website.

Four-Month-Old Baby Brutalised

"A four-month-old boy was taken to Auckland's Middlemore Hospital on Saturday night (2 August) from his home in Papakura with critical head injuries which police said were non-accidental."  He is now fighting for his life in the same hospital which the horribly abused Kahui twins were taken to, but later died.  "The baby's parents, aged 18 and 19, reside in a rundown home where parties were always being held and people came and went at all hours."  Yeah, well that's going to help isn't it.  "Yesterday, empty beer bottles lay on the unmown lawn with other rubbish."  More detail on this case at www.stuff.co.nz.

FOUR MONTHS OLD!  What animals could have done this to the poor defenceless little baby?  I am sick and tired of the same old, worn out knee-jerk reactions to New Zealand's disgusting and ongoing child-abuse problem.  The Anti-Smacking law is just one pathetic example of a beurocratic, "feel-good" law which has been forced upon New Zealand.  It does nothing to stop real child abuse while at the same time criminalising all good parents who smack their children occasionally, throwing them into the same basket as the low-life that killed the Kahui twins, 3yr old Nia and Coral Burrows.

Darren Rickard at Political Animal says,

"It is perverse that Cindy and her extreme socialist mates in the Labour Party have the whole thing back to front. That is socialism for you though. By its very nature it is dangerous, perverse, backwards, doesn't make sense and has led to much misery and eventually death, everywhere it has been practiced. The 4 month old boy joins a long list of New Zealand child abuse victims. Despite the Labour led Government spending more than NZ 14 million on anti-violence campaigns, at least three children under the age of 5 have died at the hands of parents or others this year. Many others have been seriously injured and the removal of section 59 just sits there blowing nakedly in the breeze, as a reminder of how thoughtless its proponents were. Hang your heads anti smacking zealots, your law is a resounding failure but the sensible among us, the majority of kiwis, already knew it would be before it was passed."

Tuesday, 5 August 2008

My New Friend

I only learned of Alexander Solzhenitsyn yesterday, when his death was announced. I have learned that he was a man who stood up against evil, and sacrificed much in the cause of righteousness and freedom. Now I need to get a copy of his book, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich and find out more about this great man. I never met him, but I am sure I will be able to catch up with him one day.

Doug Philips of Vision Forum writes at his blog,


“Today, Vision Forum Ministries and freedom-loving Christians all over the world mourn the death of the man most responsible for revealing the evil of the anti-Christian regime of Joseph Stalin and waging war against a machine of Marxist oppression that caused the death of tens of millions.

“Tortured and persecuted within Stalin’s death camps, Solzhenitsyn nonetheless endured, secretly authoring his greatest work, The Gulag Archipelago, on scrounged toilet paper. In the years that followed, Solzhenitsyn emerged as the single most important anti-communist voice of freedom in the world. But for Solzhenitsyn’s relentless campaign to bring the truth of Marxist tyranny to the public forefront, untold millions more might have died. During the Cold War, his message was pivotal in strengthening the resolve of the West to stand firm against Soviet oppression. In all, he would publish twenty-five books, not including plays and numerous speeches.

“Though Solzhenitsyn was a devoted Russian nationalist, he was also a grateful resident of the United States during his years in exile from his homeland. That gratitude took the form of the message of a prophet committed to helping Americans stay the course by remembering their own Christian foundations and rejecting the destructive trends of humanism and secularism. There were times at the height of the Cold War in which Solzhenitsyn — a Russian — appeared the most outspoken conscience of the West, ever reminding us of our Christian foundations and warning us of the consequences of moral weakness and lack of resolve when engaging international Marxism. For this he was often despised by the press, by pundits, and politicians.

Click here to read the rest of Doug's post, which includes an amazing quote from Solzhenitsyn's Harvard speech.

Policeman Escorting Girl to School Daily

You know there is something horribly wrong when you hear of (yet another) Government program which has been created to ensure that children stay at school. The "Rock On" scheme is a 16-week programme, aimed at cutting truancy levels in New Zealand.

"There's an informal conference held at the school, where some of the agencies get together, along with the school, and discuss what the issues are." - said Senior Sergeant John Robinson, who's duty it is to escort a fourteen-year-old girl to Linwood College, Christchurch - every single morning.

Family First spokesman Bob McCoskrie responded,

"A dangerous precedent is being set by the police by taxiing a truanting 14 year old to school every morning, and fails to deal with the underlying problems... In this case, reported from Christchurch and under a new scheme called Rock On, the police are simply fulfilling the role of the parent and are providing a short term solution to a potentially longer term problem.” - www.familyfirst.org.nz

However, Linwood College principal Rob Burrough said,

the student was back at school and doing well. "She's not a bad kid; it's just she hadn't been turning up to school," he said. "Sometimes the tough-love approach is the best way because it is a shock to students when mum or dad is going to get prosecuted because they're not going to school." He was delighted with the support of the police in taking the girl to school each day. - www.stuff.co.nz

I find it intriguing, but typical that the Government are so desperate for every last child to be attending school. They offer 20 hours of free state-funded child-minding for all three - four year-old children, so that mothers can get out of the home, away from the children, and back into the workforce. They also punish parents who do not send their children to state schools, by charging them for the service anyway. The agenda is coming through loud and clear, our present government is sold on the idea of social change (to put it politely), achieved through the state-schooling system.

Monday, 4 August 2008

Swing in the Polls

I got emailed this by an ACT supporter, who at this stage doesn't want to be named...

Amazing Grace


This video is taken from the end of Michael Apted's 2006 film, Amazing Grace, featuring the Hornblower TV series star Ioan Gruffudd (one of my favourite actors) as William Wilberforce.  I've watched the movie twice in the theatre, but our family really should buy it on DVD.  While it's not an exact account of the life and deeds of William Wilberforce, no historical movies ever are.  Released in New Zealand at the time that we were busy collecting signatures for the Anti-Smacking Law petition, the film came as a huge encouragement to us.  William Wilberforce collected 390,000 signatures from across England, calling for the abolition of the slave trade.  And we collected 390,000 signatures calling for a referendum on the (anti-democratic) Anti-Parental-Authority law which was passed against the will of 83% of New Zealanders.

We sang this at Church last night, so uplifting.  And then today, a friend sent me a link to this video.  :)

Sunday, 3 August 2008

Abortion Supervisory Committee Appeals High Court Ruling

The Abortion Supervisory Committee ASC) is a Government department, entrusted with keeping the abortion law (Contraception, Sterilisation, and Abortion Act 1977) in New Zealand under review.  Pro-life group Right to Life NZ appealed to the High Court for a review to be done on the ASC, and in mid-June 2008, the High Court's ruling came back,

"The judgment found that “there is reason to doubt the lawfulness of many abortions authorised by certifying consultants. Indeed the Committee itself has stated that the law is being used more liberally than Parliament intended” Justice Miller stated that ; “In my opinion , the statistics and the Committee’s comments over the years since the Court of Appeal made that observation do give rise to powerful misgivings about the lawfulness of many abortions. They tend to confirm Dr Forster’s view that New Zealand essentially has abortion on request.” The Court held that the Committee does in fact have the power to review and scrutinise the decisions of certifying consultants and to require them to keep records and question them on the use of the mental health ground to authorise 98% of the abortions in New Zealand."

The relevant piece of law is Section 32 of the Contraception, Sterilisation, and Abortion Act 1977, which refers to Section 187A of the Crimes Act 1961, which in turn states,

Part (1) For the purposes of sections 183 and 186 of this Act, any act specified in either of those sections is done unlawfully unless, in the case of a pregnancy of not more than 20 weeks' gestation, the person doing the act believes- (a) That the continuance of the pregnancy would result in serious danger (not being danger normally attendant upon childbirth) to the life, or to the physical or mental health, of the woman or girl"

I am providing some background here, to clarify the significance of the ASC's recent appeal to the High Court, over their ruling on the ASC's application of the abortion law in New Zealand.  The ASC is claiming that the Judge's two key findings (1) “There is reason to doubt the lawfulness of many abortions authorised by certifying consultants.”, and (2) “The approval rate [for abortions] seems remarkably high, bearing in mind that under section 187A the consultants must form the good faith opinion that continuance of the pregnancy would result in serious danger to the mother’s health.” are groundless.

However, it is obvious that the lawfulness of many abortions to date is doubtful, when you consider that 98% of abortions in New Zealand are authorised on mental health grounds.  And so Right to Life is confident that the High Court will uphold its previous finding,

"Right to Life is confident that the Court of Appeal will uphold the judgment in respect to these important issues. It is the intention of Right to Life to cross appeal and re present our case denied in the High Court for the legal recognition of the status of the unborn child as a human being and a person endowed by its Creator with human rights, the foundation right being the right to life. Secondly there will be the opportunity to put before the Court of Appeal the issue which the Royal Commission considered important, whether abortion counsellors should be independent from abortion providers."

I await the High Court's response with interest.  The short video below offers a succinct overview of the initial response of the High Court back in mid-June.



(hat tip, Big News)

Related posts: Complaint Laid Over Offensive YouTube Attack, The Link Between Abortion and Child Abuse, Abortion Shellshock

All Blacks Dominate Wallabies

On Saturday night at Eden Park, Auckland, the All Blacks made the Wallabies (Australia) pay a huge price for their victory last week.  Demolishing the Australians 39 points to 10, the All Blacks were strengthened having their captain Richie McCaw back from recuperation.


Number 10, Daniel Carter kicks the Aussies into tomorrow.

Went round to a friend's place and watched the replay, projected onto their wall which was cool.  The little picture-frame hook near the top of the picture was of constant interest to me, but from memory, the ball never hit it.  Mmmm, had some good Munchos which went so well with the dry gingerale.  I even got given a little Wallabies cupcake, complete with green icing, two yellow pebbles and a wallabies flag sticking out the top.  That's devotion.  Watching the Wallabies get thrashed with half the room Aussies and half Kiwis, it doesn't get much better than that.


Dominate.

Those Rugby Players are hard men.  My jaw drops as I see them throwing their bodies down onto the ground, or into two oncoming defence players.  Or in the middle of a ruck, getting the cleats in the back, or having a 110kg All Black sitting on your head.  You'd have to be 50% stupid and 50% brave to play a game like that.  Not my cup of tea.

Saturday, 2 August 2008

Kneejerk Expected from Double Homicide

Police were called to Harold Holt Ave, Napier at 12.25am after residents reported hearing gunshots. A woman was found dead on the footpath with gunshot wounds. A man was found nearby, still alive, but with similar injuries. The man was rushed to hospital, but died soon after being admitted.  Detective Senior Sergeant Tony Dewhirst said that it was too early  to say if anyone else was involved, and police were not currently looking for anyone else in connection with the shooting.
(Report compiled from Stuff, Newstalk ZB and TVNZ)


This sounds too much like a double homicide.  A man and a women who both died from bullet wounds, and found lying on the sidewalk by Police in the early hours of the morning.  :( It's hard to comprehend, two people coughing out their last breaths, lying on the cold hard tarceal outside their home while, about 700km south, I was blithely going about my life here in Christchurch.

The inevitable knee-jerk reaction will come, a public outcry followed up by proposals of further tightening of our gun-laws.  Instead of focussing on the crime of the murderer, the Government is likely to look into passing some new legislation which will punish everyone else in New Zealand who didn't commit the murder.  It's quite simple, find the low-life who did this, and hang him.

Google News will keep you updated on this tragic case.


Update (3/8/08):
- Case may be homicide/suicide - NZ Herald
- Police have identified the victims as 61 year old Stephen Webby and 39 year old Annette Pollock. - Newstalk ZB

Did Leonardo da Vinci Really Paint the Mona Lisa?

Did Leonardo da Vinci really paint the Mona Lisa? Of course he painted it you’ll say. But how can you be sure that it was Leonardo who painted this most famous of all masterpiece artworks? I have another idea of how the Mona Lisa came into being…

At the time when Leonardo a young apprentice in Florence, in an abandoned attic just above the apprentices dormitory, an almost used up roll of canvas that was leaning on the wall toppled over. This was probably due to a scuffle between the boys in the room below which shook the old building a little. Amazingly, the roll of canvas fell onto a canvas stretching frame, which had been left there.

Several weeks later, during another rowdy pillow-fight between the apprentices, the roll of canvas rolled off the wooden frame and onto the floor, leaving just enough canvas covering the frame. Some days after this, An earthquake shook Florence and a wooden box of staples fell onto one side of the canvas covered frame, causing the frame to turn over onto its front, with the canvas underneath. When the box of staples hit the floor, thousands of staples flew up into the air as the box smashed. Inconceivably, just the right number of staples fell around the sides of the frame – a gust of wind from under the door had folded the canvas up around the sides of the frame, and the staples all fell into just the right places and stuck themselves into the frame, pinning the canvas down – just the way the maestro of the guild would have if he had been doing it.

Several years passed, and Leonardo grew up, increasing in his skills, and beginning to get the attention of the maestro due to the talent he displayed.

One day, back up in the attic, as some builders were setting up scaffolds next door, several small bottles of powdered colouring fell to the floor, from the shelf above the now prepared canvas. As they fell, they knocked over an old board that was leaning against the wall, and this in turn, as it fell, smashed an urn of painter’s oil, making it run all over the floor, and underneath the painting.

As the builders next door continued their work, the vibration caused the oil and the colour powders to combine. As the new paint, of all different colours seeped underneath the framed canvas, it merged with other colours.

Two weeks later, as the scaffolding was being taken down, one of the builders was careless, and half of the scaffolding collapsed to the ground, creating a terrific noise, and shaking the buildings around it. This was enough for the heavy paperweight up on the shelf in the attic to come falling down, and again, striking the painting on one side, and causing it to flip up and lean against the wall.

It was a good year after this that, when Leonardo was one day sent up to the attic to give it a clean out, by his master, that he found the painting. It was beautiful! Realising that the maestro didn’t even know it existed, after he had tidied up the attic, Leonardo hid the masterpiece between two sheets of faded paper, and hid it at the back of the cupboard he and his fellow apprentices shared.

For many years, Leonardo kept his painting hidden, until, three years after starting up his own painting business, he took it carefully from on top of the book-case in his study, and hung it on his wall…

By now, you’ll be convinced that I am absolutely mad. How could so many coincidental and seemingly impossible things all happen in the right order, at the right time, and to the right thing, ending in the most valuable, famous, and arguably the best masterpiece in the world?

And you would be right.

Because, by asking you to believe this preposterous story, I am insulting your intellect and supposing that you have no intelligence.

You may have seen the Mona Lisa in the Louvre in Paris. Or perhaps you’ve seen it in a book. There is a copy of the painting on the front of this booklet. Looking at it, how do you know that there was a painter? How do you know that it didn’t happen accidentally, but that someone – Leonardo da Vinci did in-fact paint it?

Its simple isn’t it? When you look at a painting – any painting, you know it didn’t just “happen”, but that there must have been a painter. In the same way, when you see a building, how do you know that there was a builder? The building itself is proof.

Have you ever had a good look around you – at the World? Have you looked closely at a leaf, or a flower? What about a simple daisy? The little daisies that grow on your lawn, white petals and a yellow center. Did you know that each “petal” is actually a separate flower? The detail and perfection is staggering. The design is flawless and outstanding. How could you look at it and tell yourself that its existence is accidental and coincidental.

Or the human eye? A sparrow, whose tiny heart is strong enough to power its wings to fly? Daffodils which lie dormant all winter, hibernating, and then in the Spring, pushing shoots through the ground, followed by a detailed, delicate bunch of golden petals?

You cannot look around at the creatures and creation, without wondering at least, how it came into being, or how it is able to continue – how the geese in Canada know where to fly before the Winter comes.

We all know that the World must have been created. In the same way that we have no doubt that the Mona Lisa was painted by a painter, we know that the world was created by a creator. For me or you to suggest that the World did come about by accident, with no design – evolution, is obviously ludicrous.

OBJECT        CAUSE
painting            painter
building            builder
creation            creator

So the question we have to ask now is: Who was the creator?

In the very first sentence in the Bible, in Genesis chapter one, verse one, we read that “In the beginning God created the heavens (sky) and the earth”. Here we see that it was God who created the World. God existed before the World was created – he designed and maintains His creation. He even designed you. When God made the first man and woman, Adam and Eve, they were perfect and sinless. It was only after they broke God’s law that sin entered the World (we call this the Fall). Since then, everyone who has been born is sinful by nature.

Shortly after Adam and Eve sinned, God gave his law, the Ten Commandments to humans. These ten rules are the guidelines that God gives us to live by. We are all required to keep these commandments. Unfortunately, due to our sinful hearts, resulting from the Fall, none of us, neither you, nor me, nor any of us can completely keep God’s law perfectly.

God, being just and perfect, cannot stand sin and so requires that we be punished for breaking his ten commandments. Is this fair you may ask? Yes, it is fair, because, since God created us, He decides what happens to us.

“But I’m not a bad person, I’ve never killed anyone – I’m actually not that bad – God wouldn’t send me to Hell”. Let’s do a quick test and look at a few of the Ten Commandments.

The third commandment says “You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain”. Have you ever used God’s or Jesus’s name as a swear-word?

And the sixth commandment says “You shall not murder”. The Bible says that whoever hates his brother has committed the equivalent of murder in God’s eyes.

The seventh commandment reads: “You shall not commit adultery”. Jesus said that whoever looks at a woman to lust after her, has already committed adultery with her in his heart. Have you ever looked with lust?

The eighth commandment says: “You shall not steal”. Have you ever stolen anything? Anything at all, regardless of value.

None of us can say that we have kept God's law.  The Bible says: “There is none who does good, - no not one”. This means, that though we may do good deeds, for instance, you may work hard, give to charity and try to be a good person, but we are all still sinners. All of us have broken God’s law, and so we are all deserving God’s punishment which is to send us to Hell for eternity – for ever and ever.

“Oh, but I don’t believe in Heaven and Hell”, you say. What if I was going to walk off the top of a six story building? What could possibly happen to me? I can’t see gravity, therefore what could go wrong? Just because you can’t see Heaven or Hell, or God, doesn’t mean they don’t exist.

There is a way out. Just over 2000 years ago, God sent His son, Jesus into the world as a baby. He grew into a man, never sinning, and lived a perfect life. He was then crucified at the age of thirty-three – but not because of anything He had done wrong.

John 3:16 says: “God so loved the World that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.

It is as simple as that. Believe in Jesus Christ, and that His death on the cross paid for your sins, and you will be saved! This is excellent news - that when God looks at you on judgement day, he won’t see a sinful person who has broken his Ten Commandments. Rather He will see the perfect life of Christ - and allow you into Heaven.

You may still be skeptical.

Hell is a reality and all of us have to be prepared for the Day of Judgment, when God will judge everyone in the World according to His Ten Commandments. Just think - what if you are wrong - you may not accept that God does exist - maybe you think Christianity is all based on an outdated book. Or perhaps you simply say you “don’t care”. But what if you are wrong? What are you going to have to say to God when He judges you? You’ll have nothing to say in your defense, and so will have to suffer the eternal punishment that will rightfully be yours. It is up to all of us in this life to get right with God, and turn our lives round, to serve Him.

Get hold of a Bible and read it daily. The book of John in the New Testament would be good to start with. And the New King James version of the Bible would be preferable.

Pray. It is important to pray to God. Initially, you must ask the Lord Jesus to come into your heart, repent whole-heartedly of your sins and trust in Him for your salvation. Then you have to actually live like a Christian, fighting the temptations that are around.  Here's how Jesus suggested that we should pray, it's just a model that we can base our own prayers around.

Above all, be thankful to Jesus for His death on the cross for you, and everyone who does trust in Him and then you too, will want to tell others of that salvation that can be theirs.


I wrote this as an idea for a Gospel tract back in 2005. Made a couple of small changes and have re-published it here.  Check out www.livingwaters.com for lots more information and help. Thanks to Ray Comfort for the inspiration for this booklet.

Update (3/8/08): Rick Responds, "Andy's Creation Myth"

Timeless Cinematic Moments 10


(at 1:03)

Russell Crowe wowed film critics and movie-goers alike in his portrayal of the misunderstood maths-genius John Nash, in Ron Howard's film A Beautiful Mind (2001). Backed by an award-winning soundtrack composed by James Horner, the film also has a ridiculously good line-up of acting talent, starring Jennifer Connelly, Ed Harris, Christopher Plummer, Paul Bettany and Adam Goldberg who you would recognise from Saving Private Ryan. I can't tell you anything about the movie, because it would spoil it for you. If you haven't seen it already, make sure you put it on your "to-watch" list, because with 4 Academy Awards, it is not only a must-see film, but also extremely thought-provoking and moving.

Friday, 1 August 2008

Weekly Joke

A scientist and a poet were traveling in the same compartment on a train. They had never met before, so naturally there wasn't much conversation between the two. The poet was minding his own business, looking out the window at the beauty of the passing terrain. The scientist was very uptight, trying to think of things he didn't know so he could try to figure them out. Finally, the scientist was so bored that he said to the poet, "Hey, do you want to play a game?" The poet, being content with what he was doing, ignored him and continued looking out the window, humming quietly to himself. This infuriated the scientist, who irritably asked again, "Hey, you, do you want to play a game? I'll ask you a question, and if you get it wrong, you give me $5. Then, YOU ask ME a question, and if I can't answer it, I'll give YOU $5."

The poet thought about this for a moment, but he decided against it, seeing that the scientist was obviously a very bright man. He politely turned down the scientist's offer. The scientist, who by this time was going mad, tried a final time. "Look, I'll ask you a question, and if you can't answer it, you give me $5. Then you ask ME a question, and if I can't answer it, I'll give you $50!"

Now, the poet was not that smart academically, but he wasn't totally stupid. He readily accepted the offer. "Okay," the scientist said, "what is the EXACT distance between the Earth and the Moon?" The poet, obviously not knowing the answer, didn't stop to think about the scientist's question. He took a $5 bill out of his pocket and handed it to the scientist. The scientist happily accepted the bill and promptly said, "Okay, now it's your turn." The poet thought about this for a few minutes and then asked, "All right, what goes up a mountain on three legs, but comes down on four?"

The bright glow quickly vanished from the scientist's face. He thought about this for a long time, taking out his notepad and making numerous calculations. He finally gave up on his notepad and took out his laptop, using his Multimedia Encyclopedia. After about an hour of this, the poet quietly watching the mountains of Colorado go by the whole time, the scientist FINALLY gave up. He reluctantly handed the poet a $50 bill. The poet accepted it graciously, turning back to the window.

"Wait!" the scientist shouted. "You can't do this to me! What's the answer?" The poet looked at the scientist and calmly put a $5 bill into his hand.

These Are Not Words

The title of this post is a simple form of a self-refuting statement, also commonly refered to as an oxymoron.  Madeline over at mandmandmandm.blogspot.com has made a list of five philosophical refutations that employ self-reference.  It is really worthwhile to get these under your belt, for when someone tries one of these frequently used statements on you.



1. There is no such thing as truth.

Example (1.) asserts a truth, so if it is true that there is no such thing as truth then (1.) is false. Conversely, if it is false that there is no such thing as truth then (1.) is false.

The negation of (1.) that there is such thing as truth is not just true but is necessarily true. Example (1.) is self-refuting and its negation is self-verifying.

Conclusion: There is such thing as truth. Anyone who says there is not is wrong.

2. It is wrong to judge.

Example (2.) asserts a judgment; as such, it refers to itself, so if it is true that it is wrong to judge then (2.) is false, the asserter purports to make a correct moral judgement. Conversely, if it is false that it is wrong to judge then (2.) is false.

The negation of (2.) that it is right to judge is not just true but is necessarily true. Example (2.) is self-refuting and its negation is self-verifying.

Conclusion: It is right to judge. Anyone who says it is not is judging you.

Now we have the basics, let’s try something trickier.

3. All religions are true.

Christianity is a religion. If (3.) is true, then Christianity is true. Christianity teaches that it is the only true religion, therefore, all religions except Christianity are false. According to (3.),Christianity is the only true religion.

Turning now to some slightly more useful examples

4. Nothing is true unless science proves it.

Really, including example (4.) itself?

5. Nothing can be known.

Example (5.) itself cannot be known, as such it is not known whether anything is knowable or not.


Click here for Madeline's original post.

Related posts: Truth, Deterioration of Soceity Accelerating